Chapter 2 – Accepting

In this chapter, you will demonstrate how effectively you can integrate Open Educational Resources (OER) into your curriculum. The alignment of OERs with your course objectives is critical in ensuring that they enhance the learning experience, meet diverse student needs, and support collaborative learning environments.

Your course syllabus should showcase the following:

  • OER Integration: Incorporate a variety of OER formats (e.g., texts, multimedia, interactive tools) that are well-mapped to your course objectives. Clearly define how each OER resource enhances the learning goals.
  • Pedagogical Value: Articulate the educational value of the chosen OERs, ensuring alignment with your course’s intended learning outcomes. Highlight how the OERs will support and enrich your teaching strategies.
  • Student Learning Enhancement: Demonstrate how OERs address diverse learning styles and needs. Your syllabus should illustrate how the resources provide opportunities for personalized learning and inclusivity.
  • Collaboration Promotion: Incorporate collaborative activities or projects that effectively utilize OERs to foster student interaction and teamwork.
  • Overall Coherence and Quality: Ensure your syllabus is well-organized and that the integration of OERs is clear, purposeful, and enhances the overall learning experience.

Submission Instructions:

Please submit your course syllabus using the form embedded below. Your submission will be reviewed and assessed based on the rubric provided. This rubric evaluates your alignment of OERs with the course objectives, the pedagogical value of your resources, and the overall coherence of your syllabus.

A table titled "Curriculum Alignment Rubric" with five rows and four columns. The table evaluates different criteria across three levels: Developing, Competent, and Accomplished. Row 1 (OER Integration): Developing: Limited or single OER format, loosely connected to course objectives. Competent: Incorporates a variety of OER formats, clearly mapped to course objectives. Accomplished: A diverse range of OER formats, deeply integrated into the course objectives, with a clear, innovative alignment. Row 2 (Pedagogical Value): Developing: Minimal explanation of the educational value of OERs; lacks depth. Competent: Articulates the educational value, with clear alignment to learning outcomes. Accomplished: Provides insightful, comprehensive explanations of the educational value, showing innovative alignment with course goals. Row 3 (Student Learning Enhancement): Developing: OERs are not clearly tailored to different learning needs or styles. Competent: Demonstrates consideration of diverse learning styles and needs through OER choices. Accomplished: OERs are expertly tailored to a wide range of learning styles and needs, significantly enhancing the learning experience. Row 4 (Collaboration Promotion): Developing: Few or no collaborative activities using OERs. Competent: Includes collaborative activities/projects that effectively use OERs. Accomplished: Features innovative and engaging collaborative activities, fostering high levels of student interaction and teamwork. Row 5 (Overall Coherence and Quality): Developing: The syllabus lacks organization and clarity in OER integration. Competent: The syllabus is well-organized, with clear and purposeful integration of OERs. Accomplished: Exceptionally well-organized syllabus with seamless and innovative OER integration.

Once your syllabus has been reviewed against this rubric, you will receive feedback and may proceed to Chapter 3 – Adapting.

 

 

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

OER Learning Architect Copyright © by Christine Crefton is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book